Session length

1 / 20

Warrantless arrest for destruction of property is permissible if there is an eyewitness and the officer did not witness the act.

True

Probable cause can justify a warrantless arrest, and a credible eyewitness can provide that probable cause even if the officer did not personally witness the act. In a destruction of property case, if an eyewitness saw the act and can identify the person who destroyed the property, the officer has a basis to arrest without a warrant because there is reasonable evidence that the person committed the crime. The critical factor is the reliability of the eyewitness and the link they provide between the suspect and the destruction; the officer’s own observation isn’t required. That’s why the statement is true.

False

Only with a warrant

Not allowed

Next question

Find the option that is right for you!

All options are one-time payments.

$12.50

30 day premium pass

All the basics to get you started

  • Ad-free experience
  • View your previous attempt history
  • Mobile app access
  • In-depth explanations
  • 30 day premium pass access
$30.00 $87.50 usd

6 month DELUXE pass (most popular)

Everything with the 30 day premium pass FOR 6 MONTHS! & the ultimate digital PDF study guide (BONUS)

  • Everything included in the premium pass
  • $87.50 usd value for $30.00! You save $57.50!
  • + Access to the ultimate digital PDF study guide
  • + 6 months of premium pass access
  • + Priority support
$12.50 $18.99

Ultimate digital PDF study guide

For those that prefer a more traditional form of learning

  • Available for instant download
  • Available offline
  • Hundreds of practice multiple choice questions
  • Comprehensive content
  • Detailed explanations
Image Description
Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy